Morse Barnes Brown and Pendleton
Digg icon reddit icon Stumbleupon icon
Print Email     Print Edition Stories
Charlie Cameron, founder and director, Hub Angels Investment Group LLC, suggests startup CEOs take a voluntary pay cut rather than face staff cuts.

Friday, December 19, 2008

Looking ahead: Sector by sector surveys of the landscape ahead

VCs, angel investors: IPOs may be frozen until 2011

By Galen Moore

There will be no thaw until 2011 — that’s what some conservative pundits are saying about the frozen market for initial offerings of public stock. Meanwhile, the mergers and acquisitions market looks more like a flea market. On Wednesday, a national survey of VCs said 72 percent expect no market for IPOs until 2010 or beyond.

Castile Ventures partner Skip Besthoff said the Waltham venture firm is not investing in new companies that can’t plan to survive at least 24 months without seeking a second round. And Hub Angels Investment Group LLC founder and director Charlie Cameron is advising startup CEOs that are facing staff cuts to consider a voluntary pay cut instead.

A host of regional startups have been near exit-ready since before the downturn. Those companies now face an indefinite waiting period.

In June, 5-year-old open-source software maker Black Duck Software Inc. instituted a “spend smart” program that limited spending to three purposes, said CFO Kenneth Goldman: to do the right thing by customers; to bring in new business; or to do the right thing by employees.

“If there’s a requested expenditure that doesn’t fall into one of those three categories, chances are it doesn’t get funded,” Goldman said. “We’re just being a lot more deliberate about each dollar we spend.”

Lexington-based Gomez Inc. filed notice with the federal government in May of its plans for an $80.5 million IPO, expecting its mandatory quiet period to last about nine months. Now the site performance monitoring company is stuck in limbo, which CEO Jaime Ellertson says may not be such a bad thing.

“As we continue to grow, it’s pretty healthy for us to be in the mode of acting like a public company, reporting like a public company,” he said. In the first six months of 2008, Gomez reported a net loss of $868,000 on revenue of $21.2 million, according to its latest public filing.

Some companies turned down M&A offers before the September crash thinking 2009 would see an improvement, said M&A banker Peter Falvey, managing director of Boston-based Revolution Partners — which itself was acquired by investment management firm Morgan Keegan & Co. Inc. earlier this month. Now, with a freeze that could last a year or more, plus one or two years to rebuild business momentum, some investors face no exit until 2011, Falvey said. “Once you’re talking about time frames that long, people start thinking about selling.”

Not every company will make it to a successful exit, acknowledged Andrey Zarur, a partner at Waltham’s Kodiak Venture Partners — but that doesn’t necessarily spell disaster for VCs. Even in good times, startups fail, he said.

In a downturn, healthy companies’ gains may offset losses within a portfolio, added Kodiak founding partner Dave Furneaux.

“You have to cut costs and then that puts you in a position to take advantage of the situation that’s around you,” Zarur said. “Whenever this is over, instead of having one of the leaders, we have the dominant company in a space.”

However, venture capitalists are in trouble if all they know how to do is price up a Series B and expect good returns, Zarur said. “Venture as usual doesn’t work in a downturn,” he said.

 


Exit strategies
Executives and VCs offered up their thoughts on exit strategies and IPOs over the next couple of years.
 

“Our (M&A) pipeline is actually pretty strong. We probably have at least eight companies nationally that have some sort of letters of intent on the table.”
Peter Falvey, Managing director, Revolution Partners

“I’m employing fewer people than I would have because of the lack of access to public markets. It’s not just raising money, it’s investing it and turning it into more profits and happily employing more people.”
Russ Wilcox, CEO, E Ink Corp.

“The horse has left the barn and gone down the path. There’s no viable IPO market until they clean up the stupid Sarbanes-Oxley (reporting requirements).”
Robert Crowley, President, Massachusetts Technology Development Corp.

“What corporate M&As are thinking about is, ‘Let’s go to the bargain rack and see what’s there.’ You will see bottom-fisher type of activity among strategics and among financial investors as well.”
Skip Besthoff, partner, Castile Ventures

“We’re seeing deals be done. They’re fewer, they’re taking longer, and the multiples are down. Six (times earnings) is the new 10.”
Charlie Cameron, founder and director, Hub Angels Investment Group LLC



 

Digg icon reddit icon Stumbleupon icon
Contact Editor Latest News

Comments (1)

Please Login/Register to post comments.

Posted by: marshallsterman@c... / Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 - 10:14 am EST
“Washington Is Killing Silicon Valley” (Opinion- WSJ: 12/22/08, by Michael S. Malone) is “on point”, but doesn’t address some of the additional culprits, the VC industry being partially responsible as well, because of their own culpability/cupidity. Long before Sarbanes-Oxley and FASB the so called “establishment” within the investment banking/brokerage community (read Goldman, Morgan, and the likes of B. Madoff) managed to take over the controlling committees of the NASD and other industry anointed regulatory bodies. The holy dispensers of the books and records, our accounting professionals, pressed for their own place at the trough as they lobbied for more paperwork and mindless oversight. The SEC also lost its way and has forgotten that capitalism and the constitution helped create the opportunities we now enjoy (or used to). Talk to any practicing securities attorney that deals with our ‘protectors’. They are working diligently to impede registration statements and cause irreparable harm to those companies needing capital because of their own sense of what is good for the public. The results of these and other inequities have been to place to great a price on access to those public markets and to eliminate the small broker dealer who, in the past, provided capital and a platform for the start-ups and early stage companies that we have a crying need for today. But back to the VC community who takes no blame (at least I haven’t seen anyone in the industry taking responsibility for it) for the quality of the product that they have put their name on for public consumption. In fact, the whole idea that there is not an IPO market is a fiction. Or to put it another way, the lack of the IPO market today has been self induced by the investment bankers and VC’s who have been in a love fest for far too long. What’s really happened is that the investment bankers who churned out VC product for so many years did not work in the interests of their clients (buyers) but wanted fees and additional product from their B School buddies who were credit rating bureaus unto themselves. Tell me, did you ever see the public get the same terms and conditions and pricing that the VC’s take? If they want to get to their “exit” today let them offer something that looks like the following: 1. No selling shareholders and lock-ups that are tied to stock market performance for 3 years. 2. 75% of the IPO is in a convertible debt with at least a 10% PIK. 3. The convertible is at a 20% premium at the offering but after one year converts at 10% discount to the prevailing market. The conversion is figured quarterly at the mean of the trading range for the last 5 day trading sessions of that quarter. 4. The price is determined under a Hambrecht like auction. Why do I think this approach will work? I do think the VC’s are smart and what they will ‘bring’ will have a lot of appeal and that there still are a lot of investors who can and will assume some risk. This kind of an offering is investor friendly and offers some insurance that the VC and insiders are really tied to performance.

On the MHT blog now

Flagsuit wins another NASA Astronaut Glove Challenge

Southwest Harbor, Maine's Peter Homer won $450,000 in NASA's Astronaut Glove Challenge yesterday. This is Homer's second time winning the contest. Homer's first win in 2007 launched his startup, Flagsuit. Flagsuit is developing pressure suits using the same technology as Homer's prizewinning gloves -- for use as a wearable substitute for hyperbaric chambers used to treat conditions such as ...

Read More

Most Popular Stories
EmailedViewed
Stay Informed
Check which newsletter you'd like to receive.
TechFlash (Daily)
FinanceFlash (Daily)
BioFlash (Daily)
GreenFlash (Weekly)
Startup Report (Weekly)
Breaking news, MHT events, local announcements
RSS feeds
Your email:

Affiliate publications: ACBJ.com, Boston Business Journal, Bizjournals.com, Portfolio.com, Wired.com

Web Site Developed by Neptune Web, Inc.

Use of, registration on, this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement. Please read our Privacy Policy (updated) A publishing partner with Portfolio