GreenFlash
Digg icon reddit icon Stumbleupon icon
Print Email     Print Edition Stories
Rachel Lovinger, senior content strategist, Avenue A | Razorfish

Friday, September 26, 2008

Inside Web 3.0

Web 3.0 is on its way: Why should you care?

It’s been said that content is king. But with the unstoppable proliferation of corporate, editorial, academic, government and user-generated content, it’s more like a mad monarch running amok in the asylum. How do we make sense of it all and bring some sanity back to our digital lives?  Some say that the integration of Web 3.0 will begin to save us from this constant barrage of information, and that web searching will soon have an entirely new meaning.

With the current state of the web, it is often difficult to find relevant content in the mess. Then, when you do find it, you know it could be doing so much more for you — if it were speaking to related content and services. Better search is not the answer. Systems need to start understanding what content means so that they can accurately gauge what users want, and curtail hunting and gathering by intermingling disparate sources of information.

Translate that
The underlying strategy of the Semantic Web, or Web 3.0, is to create data and websites that are “machine-readable.” Why do we care if machines can read data? If machines could comprehend the meaning of the content on a website, they could manipulate data in more meaningful ways, identifying more precisely the information that the user wants, and eliminating much of the annoying noise in our everyday lives.

For example, you can use Google Maps to find the nearest Starbucks. But what if you’re looking for something even more ambiguous? Say you’re at work and you suddenly remember that you need to buy a present for your nephew whose birthday is tomorrow. Web 3.0 promises the capability to search for nearby stores that are open late and sell gifts suitable for a tech-minded teenage boy.
Or maybe you need to search for something along a number of very specific criteria. Busy at work, but need a haircut?  The Semantic Web and coordinating computers can help search for neighborhood salons and narrow the choices based on available appointments that fit in your full calendar — and provide these suggestions without the time-wasting phone calls to get an appointment. 

So, how do machines know what data means?

The Building Blocks of Web 3.0

Here are the elements that have to come together to enable the Semantic Web.

• IDs. Machines need a unique, consistent way to identify a thing or concept. For example, if I mention “Bill Clinton,” how does a machine know that this is the same person as President William Jefferson Clinton? People can usually tell by context, but a machine needs that unique identifier.

• New web standards. Web 1.0 and 2.0 were built on standards like HTML, XML, and CSS. Some new standards have been developed specifically for expressing metadata and metadata relationships. Standards such as RDF, OWL, SKOS and Dublin Core are used to define metadata in a machine-readable way.

• Ontology. These shared classifications, relationships and logic will allow machines to integrate distinct data sets and extrapolate new, unexpected information from stated information. Think of it as a hyper-glossary.

The three things listed here make the Semantic Web hypothetically possible, but to make it a reality we need commercially available software and systems that will allow people and companies to easily create, manipulate, interpret and use semantic data. Without these tools, the obstacles to adoption would be prohibitive for most organizations.

Is the Semantic Web right for you?

If you want to leverage the vast stores of excellent content and data that your company has to offer or provide rich, relevant search results, then yes.

These are the kinds of features that savvy web users are already starting to expect. Soon they’ll be demanding them. A few years ago, the common view was that you wouldn’t be able to benefit from the Semantic Web without investing huge amounts of time and money. Now the prevailing attitude has shifted toward “a little semantics goes a long way.” Semantic solutions can be adopted incrementally, with the ability to grow as needed.

As with any emerging technology, there are costs and risks associated. This technology, however, will change the way we research, search and find the things we need — cutting down on the clutter and enhancing our everyday lives.

 

Rachel Lovinger is a senior content strategist with the Boston office of interactive marketing services firm Avenue A | Razorfish. She may be reached at Rachel.lovinger@avenuea-razorfish.com.

Digg icon reddit icon Stumbleupon icon
Contact Editor Latest News

Comments (3)

Please Login/Register to post comments.

Posted by: Krista.Thomas@t... / Sunday, November 9th, 2008 - 2:59 pm EST
Great article Rachel. We at the Calais initiative are working to help with some of the heavy lifting by enabling folks to automate semantic metatagging with a free Web service and open API at OpenCalais.com. We're based in Waltham, MA and would love to meet to share some interesting developments and applications we are seeing grow out of the OpenCalais community. Let me know if that would be of interest. Best, - Krista Krista (dot) Thomas (at) ThomsonReuters (dot) com

Posted by: peter@p... / Friday, October 10th, 2008 - 9:33 am EDT
Thanks for the excellent article, Rachel. I just want to add that semantic data is far broader in its application than the current hotspots: search, content management, and social networking. Generally, the industry is taking a very subordinate view of semantics in the service of existing applications. The potential for semantics isn’t so constrained. Semantic representations are the language of thought. We are just starting to imagine applications that manipulate and share these representations of our thoughts, ideas and knowledge. I suspect next-generation applications like these will find many consumers long before consumers discover the underlying plumbing of the Semantic Web. Peter Sweeney www.primalfusion.com/blog

Posted by: sean@s... / Saturday, September 27th, 2008 - 4:52 pm EDT
There is a lot of potential in the semantic web, but what is to stop abuse? Is it going to be smart enough to sift through the dubious sites that say they're something they're not? How soon before microformats are making the web smarter? Are developers going to keep up? Are clients going to get it? Lots of questions, but we're definitely moving forward. Can't wait to see this stuff catch on.

On the MHT blog now

Bill Gates, Ray Ozzie, Microsoft execs patent 'personal data mining'

By Todd Bishop TechFlash Bill Gates, Ray Ozzie and a bunch of other heavy-hitters from Microsoft are named as inventors on a newly issued patent for a "personal data mining" system that would analyze information and make recommendations with the goal of aiding a person's decisions and improving quality of life. The patent was issued this week, based on a September 2006 patent application. I...

Read More

Most Popular Stories
EmailedViewed
Stay Informed
Check which newsletter you'd like to receive.
TechFlash (Daily)
FinanceFlash (Daily)
BioFlash (Daily)
GreenFlash (Weekly)
Startup Report (Weekly)
Breaking news, MHT events, local announcements
RSS feeds
Your email:

Affiliate publications: ACBJ.com, Boston Business Journal, Bizjournals.com, Portfolio.com, Wired.com

Web Site Developed by Neptune Web, Inc.

Use of, registration on, this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement. Please read our Privacy Policy (updated) A publishing partner with Portfolio