Posts Tagged ‘Zipcar’

Three myths of the Zipcar IPO

Thursday, April 14th, 2011

GalenMoore_blogBy Galen Moore

Zipcar’s bang-up initial public offering today has spawned all sorts of tech-press punditry. Some of it needs to be dispelled. Here are three myths about the Zipcar IPO that have little, if any, basis in reality:

1. Zipcar proves that a company can IPO without showing profit.

It doesn’t prove anything of the kind. It’s true Zipcar posted a $15 million net loss in 2010. But that’s nothing new. 2007 was a high-water mark for IPOs nationwide. Twenty New England companies went public that year. At least 11 of them priced on the public markets with net losses on their books for 2006. Some of those – Constant Contact (CTCT), Netezza, Athenahealth (ATHN) – are among the Boston tech industry’s most successful recent companies. For investors, growth is more important. Zipcar has shown plenty of that.

2. Zipcar’s underwriters shafted the company and its investors.

Bloomberg News reported Zipcar’s underwriters bought shares at $18 last night. Some time this morning, they started trading at $29.50, according to Google Finance. In a post today,  Business Insider suggested Goldman and the other investment bankers who underwrote the offering somehow knew this would happen and ought to have paid $23 to $24. (I haven’t seen this notion anywhere other than Business Insider.) In all likelihood, the Goldman clients who bought Zipcar shares paid something in the neighborhood of $19 – then turned around and quickly sold them for $19.50. Those buyers quickly re-sold the shares, and so on down the tiers of hopefuls who vied to get their hands on Zipcar before the market opened. The bottom tier paid $29.50 and may be biting their nails now, as it looks like the stock will close the day around $28. Each calculated the risk and return, and only time will tell who got the better half of each deal. I’m no stock picker, but I’d wager shares in Zipcar might not be quite as hyper-attractive if oil prices stabilize.

3. Zipcar investors are partying in the streets.

Some of them are, and some may not be. Like the tiers of buyers leading up to the IPO, Zipcar had tiers of venture capital investors. At some point, around 2003, the company was recapitalized, and presumably some of those investors were crammed down. It’s worth noting that early investor Globespan Capital Partners isn’t listed among 5 percent owners on the company’s S-1 filing. Co-founder Robin Chase, Zipcar’s first CEO, is also not listed among individual major shareholders.

Zipcar IPO prompts flip to Mass. argument – Why is Seattle getting left behind?

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

By Michelle Lang

Zipcar and its news of a $75 million IPO is a reminder to us Greater Boston folks to quit our whining.

We’re always complaining – er, conversing – about the Bay Area getting all our good ideas (i.e., Facebook), luring away startups and their innovative entrepreneurs to the West Coast, where they’ll find VC funding AND sunlight, to boot. We can’t compete with the latter, though our spring is putting up a good fight so far. But with the former, we may have an argument…at least with our potential U.S. locations that might be looking to take a good Yankee-bred idea.

Check out John Cook’s blog from Seattle TechFlash. Here’s an excerpt:

Zipcar’s $75 million IPO filing today is getting coverage in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg. But I look at the news as yet another example of a Seattle company that slipped away. Observers of Seattle startup history may recall that Cambridge-based Zipcar purchased its primary rival in 2007, a Seattle company called Flexcar that was started with support from King County in 2000 and later received backing from America Online co-founder Steve Case and former Chrysler Corp. Chief Executive Lee Iacocca.

After the merger, the company consolidated HQ operations in Massachusetts, adopted the Zipcar name and essentially took the lead in the car-sharing sector.

And that speaks to a larger issue, one I’ve often brought up here and addressed at events around town. Why aren’t swing-for-the-fences upstarts – the types of companies that file for $75 million IPOs – emerging in Seattle?

Cook highlights Zipcar’s $75 million IPO as a sign of Seattle’s predicament – good ideas selling out. “Swing-for-the-fences upstarts” – it’s flattering to think that Boston has that kind of entrepreneurial spirit. But true. When startups fail here, it may well be that they fell shy of the fences.

What I love about Cook’s blog though is the comments that follow. Take a look. “Victor” comments, “Hate to say it, this town is too “nice”, not enough primal greed, and certainly not enough killer instinct.” The comments then follow on this logic that Seattle may be too laid back. Makes me laugh – not to think of Seattle’s friendly environment being a hindrance to business, but to think that Boston’s unfriendliness may actually be an asset. Who would’ve thought that the guy/gal flipping you off as he/she cuts you off on the highway could be a top go-getting entrepreneur in the area. Next time you get the urge to return the favor on the roads, just wave and say thank you – that jerk is making Boston a better business town.

Boston chooses Bixi for bike sharing, BikeNow looks to Baltimore

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

The city of Boston has chosen the company that runs Montreal’s Bixi program to implement bike sharing in the Hub. It’s like Zipcar for bikes — bikes would be stationed at racks throughout the city, where a user would swipe a card to rent a bike, which they could return at a station near his or her destination. The AP reports: 

Boston officials are hoping to reach a decision with the Public Bike System Co. in the next 60 days to install a network of 2,500 bikes and 290 stations across the city by next summer, with the option of expanding to a 5,000-bike system encompassing the neighboring communities Brookline, Cambridge and Somerville.

It might be good news for bike-enthusiasts, but it’s a setback for BikeNow, a Boston University spinout which had been hoping to do the same thing. Amy Trus, a co-founder of the BU $50K Business Plan Competition finalist, said via email she knew BikeNow had a 50/50 chance at the contract.

BikeNow’s plan included a lower rental rate subsidized by advertising, which the city of Boston didn’t want, Trus said. Plan B for BikeNow, which based its service on Paris’ Velib program, and would act as local operators for the B-Cycle organization’s technology, is to roll out the service in Baltimore, said Trus, a Maryland native.

Kirsner: Zipcar iPhone app available in about a month

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

Zipcar’s iPhone app will be ready to go in about a month, its CEO tells Scott Kirsner, who’s pretty excited: 

Zipcar showed off a new iPhone app last month at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference that got me salivating (I’m a Zipcar member): it offers GPS help finding cars that are available, and can even honk the car’s horn to help you locate it in a parking lot. 

Zipcar may, may not file for IPO

Friday, June 12th, 2009

 

I may or may not file for an IPO myself, come to think of it.  The Times’ DealBook rounds up reports, and gets a pseudo-denial from a Zipcar spokesperson. 

Last month, the Cambridge-based hourly car-rental company was spotted by MHT software reporter Galen Moore, unequivocally lending office space to online odd job marketplace company RunMyErrand.

Affiliate publications: ACBJ.com, Boston Business Journal, Bizjournals.com, Portfolio.com, Wired.com

Web Site Developed by Neptune Web, Inc.

Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads.