Posts Tagged ‘STEM’

Gotta love federal researchers

Tuesday, July 19th, 2011

Jim ConnollyBy James Connolly

The good news for anyone who is an advocate of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) educational initiatives is that the U.S. Commerce Department says that high-salary, STEM-related jobs are likely to grow faster than non-STEM jobs in the coming years.

In particular, the department’s Economics and Statistics Administration projected that STEM occupations will grow by 17 percent from 2008 to 2018, compared with 9.8 percent growth for non-STEM occupations. That’s cool, because STEM workers command higher wages, earning 26 percent more than their non-STEM counterparts. In addition, the researchers said that over the past 10 years, growth in STEM jobs has been three times faster than in non-STEM jobs, and STEM workers are less likely to experience joblessness than their non-STEM peers.

All of this is good for the tech community that continues to struggle to find enough qualified candidates to fill their job openings.

The unfortunate part of all this is that someone on the research team couldn’t stop at just highlighting the hard STEM data. They had to ding their own credibility by highlighting what is at minimum common sense, and at worst the obvious. A summary of the report says, “In comparison to the average worker, STEM workers are highly educated.” No kidding? Isn’t that what STEM advocates have been saying right along, that these jobs require advanced education, so we need to get kids involved early and keep them engaged throughout college? It’s called belaboring the obvious. The researchers go on to state that STEM workers are more likely to have gone to college than non-STEM workers. Good luck getting that bio-engineering job with your GED.

But, then, what do you expect from the bureaucrats, attention to detail? There at the top of the press release announcing the results: “FOR IMMEDIARE RELEASE”. Immediare? We all are guilty of the occasional typo, but this one has been sitting in a prominent slot on the Commerce website for almost a week without anyone fixing it. When the battle over the debt limit wraps up, and federal employees start getting whacked, I think I see a few good candidates.

Women’s wisdom comes back around

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

By Michelle Lang

If you’ve ever heard the lyrics to Brad Paisley’s “Letter to Me”, you know that the country crooner made a song of taking his adult wisdom and imparting it on his 17-year-old self, reminding him not to bother arguing with his dad, to enjoy the adventure of his date with Bridget, and to thank his teacher for spending time with him.

The same concept is done daily by parents telling their kids, “Back when I was your age…”

Now, in honor of Women’s History Month, the Science Club for Girls is embracing the same concept; they’ve asked bright women leaders in science, engineering and technology careers to write “a letter to my young self.” What’s the point? To inspire young would-be scientists, highlight women in STEM, challenge the “geek” stereotype of those in science and enlighten people about the number of science careers available.

What interests us is that several of the Mass High Tech 2009 Women to Watch honorees have written a letter to their young selves.

Anna Mracek Dietrich, chief operating officer of Terrafugia Inc., wrote to herself, “You always regret the things you don’t do more than the things you do” (within boundaries of legality and logic).

Intel lead technologist Mondira Pant advised her 15-year-old self to “enjoy your present, welcome your doubts but don’t be afraid.”

Ronnie Maffa, Director of Social Software Product Development at IBM Corp., told her young self on the edge of possibly taking on a new project: “Be prepared that you may not be chosen. More importantly, be prepared that you will be chosen. Either way, you would have strengthened your position and preparedness for the future.”

The letters are another attempt to get science in front of girls and women. You might wonder just how many of these groups we need. After all, we’ve got the Science Club for Girls, Society of Women Engineers, the Association for Women in Science — and that’s just with a quick Google search. But it comes down to peer pressure. Just as friends, family and neighbors can sway one to a life of drugs, enough women leading interesting lives and careers in science may sway others to embrace science and technology.

So that’s our strategy too. Mass High Tech is peer pressuring girls and encouraging women leaders in science with our annual Women to Watch event on Friday, March 19, and our special report, coming out March 17, dedicated to this year’s crop of inspirational women in tech. By now, we’ve talked to our 11 new women honorees, interviewing them on their early influences, challenges and accomplishments, and they’re shaping up to be another group of go-getters. To hear what the women have to say, join us for breakfast on March 19.

Men are everywhere in high-tech. So where are they when women are talking?

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

By Michelle Lang

In the middle of a discussion about work/life balance at CA Inc.’s “Challenges and Opportunities of Women Working in the IT Field” dinner last night, Telle Whitney, president and CEO of the Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology, put a wrench in the conversation. “I don’t believe in balance,” she said. She went on to clarify that she believes in choices. “Look at your life — you can do it all, but you can’t do it at the same time.”

While she may have struck a reality chord, it was a dissonant one that aroused more than a little frustration. Afterall, about 25 women and two men were in attendance — if the ratio were reversed, would men be be having the same discussion? Would they be venting about the challenges of finding a work/life balance, finding mentors or setting up a work culture that embraces job flexibility? Perhaps, but the odds favor women-organized tech groups.

While the discussion brought up valid points, albeit ones already well known to most women in technology — or even mid-level women in the general workforce — it reiterated the same thought that follows many of these conversations: Where are the men? If technical women face challenges in a male-dominated industry, the girls’ club needs to bring these matters to the attention of those who have the authority to change the system — the executives. And in high tech, the overwhelming majority of those executives are men.

The dinner discussion addressed the need for mentoring programs, training, job flexibility and emphasis on STEM education from an early age. Yes, these are social and human issues, but to really appeal to managers and executives, women need to make a business case for these changes. Solutions like job sharing can save money for a company, retain valuable employees and win over employee loyalty and satisfaction. Likewise, training — for women and men — makes better employees who can work more efficiently. These business cases were made last night, though not to those who needed to hear it. Next time, let’s invite the boys’ club.

NewsFlash Roundup: McLean, Living Proof, Synta, Compucyte

Friday, June 19th, 2009

Obvious pair gaming and life sciences get together, and a hospital founded in the Paris of the West makes a stem cell breakthrough in today’s NewsFlash Roundup.

Also, Beauty product-making biotech Living Proof gets funding, Synta’s CMO steps down after its deal with Glaxo falls through, and CompuCyte teams up with Children’s Hospital.


Affiliate publications: ACBJ.com, Boston Business Journal, Bizjournals.com, Portfolio.com, Wired.com

Web Site Developed by Neptune Web, Inc.

Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads.