Posts Tagged ‘Startups’

AngelGate’s revealing aftermath

Friday, September 24th, 2010

The pack of doughy white boys who fancy themselves Silicon Valley super angels hit the sandbox this week for a my-dumptruck-helps-entrepreneurs-more-than-your-dumptruck battle that defies belief. The West-Coast response to Tuesday’s AngelGate report has, by contrast, shown up Boston and New York angels for what they are not good at – pimping themselves.

As an angel investor, Avid Technology founder Bill Warner is arguably the East Coast equivalent of Ron Conway – a godfatherly figure to investors and startups throughout New England. Can you imagine Warner writing an email, knowing it will become public, in which he promises to “disengage from any involvement” with a dozen other angel investors in Boston, as Conway reportedly did yesterday?

Can you imagine Mike Baker, David Cancel, Joe Caruso, Chris Dixon, Dharmesh Shah, Brian Shin or Gabriel Weinberg penning a 1,200-word, unprintable rant, and posting it to any of their widely read blogs, as respected West Coast investor Dave McClure did Wednesday?

McClure and Conway don’t speak for all the angels on the West Coast, but they are leaders. Their reactions to reports of collusion among angel investors have been entertaining, attention-getting, and useless to the business of building great technology companies. East Coast innovators complain we don’t do enough self-promotion here. Sometimes, it’s a good thing we don’t.

New York VC Fred Wilson did weigh in on AngelGate. In a Wednesday morning post, he lauded tech blogger Mike Arrington for calling attention to the possibility of collusion among investors. But in a “hypercompetitive” VC market, collusion is likely not possible, he wrote.

That was a useful comment. It didn’t cause a sensation.

This week, angels in the Hub and the Big Apple showed themselves vastly inferior to their West-Coast counterparts in three categories: preening, strutting and spewing. Unfortunately for startups in the Valley, none of those three does much good for entrepreneurs.

My goal as a journalist: to subtract value

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

I’m subjecting the good staff and clientele of the Venture Café to open office hours today.  That means I’ll be at Cambridge Innovation Center on a warm Thursday afternoon, trying to provide lucid advice for startups on how to handle media exposure.

To accomplish this goal, I’ll be ignoring the half-keg of excellent beer I know they’ll have on tap. In case I fall short of plan, here, at least, are a few coherent thoughts.

Understanding the media is simple if you understand that journalists (the good ones) are mostly trying to do one thing: be valuable to our readers. Readers are usually also sources, and the ones who know the value of a good story are usually the best sources. Good stories beget tips that lead to more good stories.

So, if you’re pitching a story to a news person, imagine yourself reading it, instead of pitching it, and ask yourself: ‘Would I find this valuable?’

OK, the relationship between journalists and information is a little more complicated than that. We don’t always seek to “add value,” as the biz-speak chestnut goes. Sometimes our goal is to remove it.

Like anything, the value of information is based on supply and demand. A company’s announcement has little value in today’s media world, because it’s immediately over-supplied via search and any number of outlets. But a news person may bring something rare to add – analysis, perspective or sources that come from knowing the subject area. Or, he or she may combine pieces of information that alone are worth little, like the Miami Herald did today with disparate accounts of scams related to the gulf oil spill.

These stories are good. But you do a journalist better when you offer information that only a few people know about. When good information is scarce, and therefore valuable, a journalist’s job is to remove some of its value, by supplying it broadly to readers. ESPN may have accomplished this today, with a report that NBA superstar Lebron James is leaning toward signing with the Miami Heat.  Let’s say you are a front-office employee at any NBA franchise. Knowing Lebron’s plans yesterday, you had some valuable knowledge. Today, after 2,000 online news organizations picked up Chris Broussard’s report, it’s the baseline for cube farm trash talk.

If you’d like to talk further, drop by the Venture Café today between 3 and 6 p.m. MassChallenge will also be there, along with Boston World Partnerships.

Young entrepreneurs crowd Lean into Spring meetup

Friday, May 28th, 2010

By Lynette F. Cornell

The standard networking event fare of fancy finger foods and classy cocktails was nowhere to be found at last night’s gathering of entrepreneurs and innovators. The crowd too was heavily skewed toward the younger set. The room was crowded and hot and extraordinarily loud, but the excitement and energy was high at the Lean Into Spring event hosted by Lean Startup Circle Boston, a monthly Meetup group focused on lean startup principles.

According to the Meetup event page, 298 people RSVP’d to the event, and by the looks of the room everyone was crammed into, most of those people actually showed up. Braving the heat and frequent elbow collisions, the crowd was a mix of people with young startups, experienced entrepreneurs and freelancers looking to join those new ventures. And some of those ventures are sounding pretty interesting.

Here are the five new companies I connected with and what they do:

1Fastbite
Headquarters: Bedford, MA
People I met: Andrea Dacayanan, CEO/Founder, and Jim Krochune, EVP Sales/Co-Founder
What they do: 1Fastbite is an online order management system that sends orders to restaurants and provides status tracking of the order for customers. According to Dacayanan, they differ from similar services like GrubHub and Foodler by helping the restaurants build relationships with their customers.

Textaurant
Person I met: Joshua Bob, Founder and President
What they do: Textaurant provides a web-based service for restaurants to use text messages or a phone call to alert patrons when their table is ready, eliminating the need for the clunky, germy notification devices commonly used. This allows the patron to do other things, such as shopping, while they wait for their table.

StudioShare.org
Headquarters: Cambridge
Person I met: Andreas Randow, President
What they do: StudioShare.org connects photographers interesting in cutting costs by sharing studio space and equipment and finding professional services and staff members.

Couchange.org
Person I met: Jia Ji, CEO
What they do: Couchange.org develops a universal donation platform that allows people to donate abandoned assets to charities. Such donations include frequent flier miles and giftcard balances.

O Sole Mio
Person I met: Misha Kogan, Partner and Designer
What they do: O Sole Mio is developing an indoor tomato growing system that uses LED lights to grow tomatoes year-round, allowing for gardening in urban environments.

Bain’s Marchick starts a fact-filled thread about startup financing

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

By Rodney Brown

Rodney BrownThe local Twitterverse is all abuzz about a blog post on the website Popsignal, a discussion platform for Boston-area tech startups. The blog contains some very specific advice, opinions and – most importantly – names on the local startup financing scene.

The discussion started on Popsignal’s LinkedIn.com profile and includes posts from people such as Dharmesh Shah of Hubspot Inc., Rob Go of Spark Capital and Adam Marchick of Bain Capital Ventures, who got it all started with a post he titled, “Is Boston Short Angels, Or Good Companies?”

The startup funding experts posting on the thread come to some general conclusions after many handfuls of posts, some of which are: The total volume of tech startups is just too low; there are two funding gaps here, $25,000 to $50,000 and $250,000 to $750,000; there are many more factors than just tightly held angel money; and the problem is cyclical.

Marchick himself provides a very hefty list of people he would talk to at various stages of a startup’s growth path. Go of Spark weighs in with his own list and suggestions, and the whole thing should be required reading for any Boston-area tech startup or budding entrepreneur.

Stonebraker’s startups: Trading in the blink of an eye

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009
Michael Stonebraker, MHT All-Star in 2008, is at it again with another startup

Michael Stonebraker, MHT All-Star in 2008, is at it again with another startup

Of the five startups Michael Stonebraker has helped to launch in recent years, three of them — including a new company brought out of stealth mode this week — are involved in an arcane segment of securities trading that has become the focus of keen interest, both by investors eager for reliable returns, and regulators concerned about market impacts.

High-frequency trading — also known as algorithmic, or black-box trading — lets investors beat the market by a hair. Proprietary algorithms crunch market data to predict small, short-term moves in stock price, then execute trades automatically, within milliseconds — before the rest of the market has time to react.

Stonebraker’s new startup, VoltDB, helps high-frequency traders assess and hedge risk during blink-of-an-eye transactions. He compared high-frequency trading’s gains to a nickel unearthed from a field by a fleet of bulldozers: High-frequency trade operations vie to be the fastest to run into the field and grab the nickel, he said.

Sounds dangerous — but the strategy proved a moneymaker in 2008, garnering new attention from investors. The New York Stock Exchange is now building a large New Jersey facility dedicated to the practice. High-frequency trading is the exchange’s future, an NYSE official told the Wall Street Journal last month.

With success has come public criticism and regulatory scrutiny. Both the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and its London counterpart, the U.K. Financial Services Authority, are now investigating how the practice might systemically affect equity markets. On Monday, Nobel prize winner and columnist for the New York Times Paul Krugman wrote that high-frequency trading levies a de facto tax on the average trader, by giving an unfair advantage to those who can afford cutting-edge technology.

Software made by two of Stonebraker’s prior companies, Vertica Systems Inc. and Streambase Systems Inc., is part of that advantage. The new company, VoltDB, is out of stealth mode with another tool high-frequency traders can use to gain an edge. High-frequency trading desks use Streambase to run algorithms and execute trades in real time. Vertica is used to test traders’ theories, back-testing algorithms against historical market data. VoltDB, still in alpha testing mode, may be used by firms to hedge exposure during the millisecond when 100 trading desks all take the same position on a security.

“Instead of getting market tics, you’re simply getting a list of trades that every desk in your company makes — and you just want to assemble the complete position of the entire company and then ask questions about it,” Stonebraker said.

Stonebraker, a 2008 Mass High Tech All-Star who is known as the “father of the relational database,” for his role on the Postgres project at the University of California Berkeley in the 1980s, explained VoltDB’s innovation. It is startlingly simple. The product is an online transaction-processing system that, unlike legacy systems, pays no attention to concurrency control, resource contention locking, recovery logs, queues or disk management. “We just get rid of all that stuff,” Stonebraker said. “That allows us to go wildly faster.”

[For the rest of Stonebraker's comments to Galen, check out "Net Gains" in this Friday's print edition.]

Affiliate publications: ACBJ.com, Boston Business Journal, Bizjournals.com, Portfolio.com, Wired.com

Web Site Developed by Neptune Web, Inc.

Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads.