Archive for the ‘Internet’ Category

Google’s Facebook competitor – aiming for too much of an unwanted thing?

Monday, July 12th, 2010

By Rodney H. Brown

Rodney BrownBoy, when Google Inc. plans to muscle in on somebody else’s territory they seem to be aiming for complete overkill.

The recent report from the website TechCrunch, which says that its sources indicate Google has invested between $100 million and $200 million in social game developer Zynga Inc., just adds to the almost confirmed rumor that Google is about to launch a Facebook competitor called Google Me. Zynga makes some of the most popular Facebook time-wasters, including Farmville and Mafia Wars.

The TechCrunch report, and others, say that Google plans to make Zynga the lynchpin of a new Google Games operations. While no one at Google has confirmed anything about the Zynga deal, it seems, speculation is running rampant that the new Google Games will be one part of Google Me, and when launched, the new social network should automatically have access to all the features of Facebook, and possibly more. That “possibly more” could be a problem, however.

When Google launched its reputed Twitter-killer, Google Buzz, it tried to make the fact that it would automatically connect to your Gmail and could automatically pull in all of your contacts as Buzz “friends” as a wanted feature and not an intrusive privacy problem. The problem was that initially it would show all of your contacts to all of your other contacts. The small community of regular Buzz users put an end to that pretty quickly with vocal protests, and Google fixed its Buzz privacy settings in April. With a track record of making Facebook-like erroneous privacy assumptions in its very first social network play, one has to wonder what Google Me will be like, if and when it launches.

Anyone looking forward for those Farmville updates from your friends dropping automatically into your Gmail? Not me. Google will need to get these privacy settings correct right out of the farmer’s gate.

My goal as a journalist: to subtract value

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

I’m subjecting the good staff and clientele of the Venture Café to open office hours today.  That means I’ll be at Cambridge Innovation Center on a warm Thursday afternoon, trying to provide lucid advice for startups on how to handle media exposure.

To accomplish this goal, I’ll be ignoring the half-keg of excellent beer I know they’ll have on tap. In case I fall short of plan, here, at least, are a few coherent thoughts.

Understanding the media is simple if you understand that journalists (the good ones) are mostly trying to do one thing: be valuable to our readers. Readers are usually also sources, and the ones who know the value of a good story are usually the best sources. Good stories beget tips that lead to more good stories.

So, if you’re pitching a story to a news person, imagine yourself reading it, instead of pitching it, and ask yourself: ‘Would I find this valuable?’

OK, the relationship between journalists and information is a little more complicated than that. We don’t always seek to “add value,” as the biz-speak chestnut goes. Sometimes our goal is to remove it.

Like anything, the value of information is based on supply and demand. A company’s announcement has little value in today’s media world, because it’s immediately over-supplied via search and any number of outlets. But a news person may bring something rare to add – analysis, perspective or sources that come from knowing the subject area. Or, he or she may combine pieces of information that alone are worth little, like the Miami Herald did today with disparate accounts of scams related to the gulf oil spill.

These stories are good. But you do a journalist better when you offer information that only a few people know about. When good information is scarce, and therefore valuable, a journalist’s job is to remove some of its value, by supplying it broadly to readers. ESPN may have accomplished this today, with a report that NBA superstar Lebron James is leaning toward signing with the Miami Heat.  Let’s say you are a front-office employee at any NBA franchise. Knowing Lebron’s plans yesterday, you had some valuable knowledge. Today, after 2,000 online news organizations picked up Chris Broussard’s report, it’s the baseline for cube farm trash talk.

If you’d like to talk further, drop by the Venture Café today between 3 and 6 p.m. MassChallenge will also be there, along with Boston World Partnerships.

Facebook gets caught with hand in jar again

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

By Rodney Brown

Rodney BrownAre the folks running Facebook evil, or just stupid?

I refer, of course, to the new Facebook “feature” that went into effect yesterday called “Instant Personalization,” which automatically allows third-party websites to tailor their experience to you by pulling personal information about you from Facebook. The company that Mark Zuckerberg built not only installed this feature with barely any notice – you got one alert at the top of your page a couple of days ago when you logged in – it automatically set the default to “allow” any site to gather the information.

Seriously, why do we need any identity thieves when Facebook is practically doing it for them? And it’s not as though this is the first time Facebook has tried to pull a fast one over on its users. As far back as 2007, Facebook tried implementing an advertising platform called Beacon, that, appropriately enough, would broadcast out to your friends whenever you might have purchased a movie ticket or bought some shoes online. After a firestorm of upset user comments about the fact that no one was told about this in advance and there was not even any way to opt out, Facebook had to make it an opt-in program or risk seeing users leave in droves.

The marketing geniuses at Facebook dealt with another user-information problem in 2009 with equal aplomb. It came out through someone’s careful study of the Facebook terms of service that you agreed when you created an account that every piece of content you posted up belonged to Facebook – every picture, every note, every wall post. Facebook’s response was initially the equivalent of “tough noogies.” Again, only after a deluge of bad press and worse user comments did Facebook “clarify” its policy to say that anything that wasn’t a completely public post would never be used for any purposes other than your own social activities. But anything public could be used by Facebook because all that content is still really theirs, you see.

So now Facebook has once again tried to sneak one past its users, and once again it got caught in the shameful beam of their parent’s flashlight. How many mistakes do we give them before we all jump ship? And it’s not that I object to the idea of using my information to better target the ads I am forced to look at anyway (OK, I do, but short of unplugging from the Intarwebs, there’s not much I can do about it), but I strongly object to not being told it is going to happen, and only being given a choice to stop it because someone stumbled on it.

But hey, at least Facebook learned something from the last two times. If you can find the “Instant Personalization” feature, it does have an “off” button. That’s a big step up from Beacon, and it only took three years.

Bain’s Marchick starts a fact-filled thread about startup financing

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

By Rodney Brown

Rodney BrownThe local Twitterverse is all abuzz about a blog post on the website Popsignal, a discussion platform for Boston-area tech startups. The blog contains some very specific advice, opinions and – most importantly – names on the local startup financing scene.

The discussion started on Popsignal’s LinkedIn.com profile and includes posts from people such as Dharmesh Shah of Hubspot Inc., Rob Go of Spark Capital and Adam Marchick of Bain Capital Ventures, who got it all started with a post he titled, “Is Boston Short Angels, Or Good Companies?”

The startup funding experts posting on the thread come to some general conclusions after many handfuls of posts, some of which are: The total volume of tech startups is just too low; there are two funding gaps here, $25,000 to $50,000 and $250,000 to $750,000; there are many more factors than just tightly held angel money; and the problem is cyclical.

Marchick himself provides a very hefty list of people he would talk to at various stages of a startup’s growth path. Go of Spark weighs in with his own list and suggestions, and the whole thing should be required reading for any Boston-area tech startup or budding entrepreneur.

Microsoft Kin phones have a familiar feature

Monday, April 12th, 2010

By Rodney H. Brown

Rodney BrownToday Microsoft Corp. announced the names and functions of their long-anticipated (for good or ill) mobile phones that had previously only been known as Project: Pink. The two flavors of Microsoft Kin phones — in an unintentional nod to Massachusetts’ Theodor Geisel, Kin One and Kin Two — were rolled out in a flashy show on the West Coast, and the Redmond titan made it clear the phones were aimed at a younger, socially connected audience.

The Microsoft Kin One and Kin Two

The Microsoft Kin One and Kin Two

One of the features the new phones will have is something called Kin Spot. That is a little green button that sits at the bottom of the main screen of the phone and allows the user to drag items such as links or pictures into a cloud-based repository that can then be associated with a friend in the contacts database and posted to their Facebook page, sent via media messaging service, tweeted out or shared in any other social media way the user might like.

Sound familiar?

Last week, I wrote about Clearway Technology Partners Inc. of Medfield, which is about to launch this summer Clearway Insight. That product is a cloud-based way to store items of interest to you — links, pictures, etc. — and then share with your friends also using Insight. You do so by simply dragging a link, picture or document to a spot … er, diamond … that sits at the bottom … sorry, top … of the computer screen.

Now, Insight also allows you to make multiple connections between not only a stored item and another connected user, but also between any number of stored items themselves. And because of all of the connections, it makes searching for data you may have dropped into Insight significantly easier and faster than using the search feature on Windows, or Spotlight on a Mac. So it is planned to be much more robust that Microsoft’s phone OS-based Spot, but the similarity is surprising.

Clearway, for its part, moved up the planned launch of the beta version of Insight to last Friday, the day our coverage hit the web. The company is restricting the beta to 100,000 users (a hopeful restriction, that) so if you want to get in on the action, visit their website and sign up.

Who knows, perhaps the Kin phones will train a whole generation of users on how to store data the Clearway Insight way. At least, that is the way Clearway would like to see it, I bet.

iPad gets a first atop Mt. Washington

Monday, April 5th, 2010
Scvngr founder Seth Priebatsch scavenges for a WiFi signal on what could be the first iPad on Mt. Washington.

Scvngr founder Seth Priebatsch scavenges for a WiFi signal on what could be the first iPad on Mt. Washington.

By Rodney H. Brown

Rodney BrownIn a news world filled with endless stories about Apple Inc.’s new iPad tablet device, here’s one you probably haven’t heard – the alleged first use of an iPad at the top of New Hampshire’s Mt. Washington.

Seth Priebatsch, founder and ‘chief ninja’ of the location-based gaming technology platform company Scvngr Inc., sent in a picture of the chief ninja himself sitting on the top of Mt. Washington this weekend with his iPad in hand. Always prepared, Priebatsch knew he wouldn’t get a WiFi signal up there – and the 3G cellular versions of the iPad aren’t out yet – so he brought along a Sprint Overdrive mobile hotspot so his iPad could also arguably be the first to surf the web on the tallest mountain in New England.

After getting on some post-hiking web surfing (and knowing him, some Scvngr work), Priebatsch then “skied down Tuckermans Ravine with the skis on my feet and the iPad in my backpack. I’ve got some scratches, but the iPad is flawless.”

So what does this tell us? The iPad doesn’t get altitude sickness. Being at the top of the tallest mountain on the Eastern Seaboard, which has just about every type of radio tower on it, gets you at least five bars on your cell device. Preibatsch is fit (have you hiked up Tucks – and past it to the summit – recently?). And geeks never want to be far from their latest toy.

No word, though, on whether or not Priebatsch was actually running a scavenger hunt while up there. Probably not – trying to stop and search for clues while schussing down Tucks can be hazardous to your health.

38 Studios: Should Curt Schilling stay or should he go?

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

By Michelle Lang

After the Providence Journal first reported that retired Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling may move his video gaming startup 38 Studios to Rhode Island, we at Mass High Tech were all a-flutter in pursuing confirmation of the news.

In case you missed it, Schilling will not be moving the startup to the Ocean State … at least not yet. And maybe not to Rhode Island. Maybe to some other state. But his goal is “to remain in Massachusetts.”

Okay, so what then are we reporting? Schilling’s wishy-washy loyalty to the Bay State? The indication that 38 Studios could bring a slew of new jobs — potentially up to 400 or so new ones — that would prompt the need for more space to grow?

Something tells me we may have fallen for the oldest PR trick in the book (maybe not the oldest, but a good one) — any news is better than none. Sure, 38 Studios is an important and promising startup to Massachusetts’ innovation economy and its budding gaming cluster, but really, what companies don’t talk theoretically about growing their number of employees? And what companies don’t weigh their options of moving for the sake of saving a few bucks?

Terrafugia, the Woburn maker of the ‘flying car’, did that just last month. And we chased that talk just as fervently, as did nearly every other local media outlet.

In that case, Terrafugia CEO Carl Dietrich told us that he had six to eight weeks to decide if the company would accept an offer of $4.4 million to move into a facility in Dayton, Ohio. His frustration by the lack of interest from local investors ultimately attracted attention from U.S. Sen. John Kerry, who paid a visit to the company; a couple of state senators who also made the trip to see the flying car and talk with Dietrich; and a group of investors who offered to provide larger headquarters.

No word yet if Terrafugia will fly west for good or if its recent attention garnered the investments it was seeking to stay in Greater Boston.

In the end, the news has thus far succeeded in bringing attention to both companies, which they, no doubt, hope will translate to money and a feasible reason to stay in Massachusetts.

As for us, maybe translating the inconclusive musings of Schilling isn’t so bad…if it means we played a role in keep businesses and jobs in New England.

Women to Watch: What makes them special

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Jim ConnollyBy James M. Connolly

Intelligence, dedicated, leader, innovative, hard-working — they’re all words associated with the 11 women recognized with the Mass High Tech Women to Watch awards this morning. But back at the office we were talking how commonly another word has to be applied to the 2010 honorees and their 60 predecessors.

It’s their humility. It’s so striking. We at Mass High Tech see it over and over again. We contact them in January to tell them they have been selected, and their total surprise is genuine. When we interview them for profiles, they talk about other women who would be more deserving, or how they can’t believe they are in the same ranks with certain women tech leaders that they admire.

2010 MHT Women to Watch

These are inventors, heads of huge development teams and CEOs. They’ve earned the right to brag.

Instead, they stand up at a podium and praise other women. They are grateful to their parents and the members of their teams. They talk about how it just makes sense for them to give back, to help and mentor young people.

Be sure to check out their profiles in this week’s Mass High Tech or on MassHighTech.com. There’s something special about them that goes beyond bits, bytes and biotech. The 250 people who came out to honor them this morning understand it. It’s their humility.

Bill Gates, Ray Ozzie, Microsoft execs patent ‘personal data mining’

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

By Todd Bishop
TechFlash

TechFlashBill Gates, Ray Ozzie and a bunch of other heavy-hitters from Microsoft are named as inventors on a newly issued patent for a “personal data mining” system that would analyze information and make recommendations with the goal of aiding a person’s decisions and improving quality of life.

PatentThe patent was issued this week, based on a September 2006 patent application. I’m not a patent examiner, of course, but as I was reading, I couldn’t help but see similarities to what other companies have been doing for a long time. For example, one potential application cited in the patent would have the system make suggestions or recommendations “with respect to books to read, movies or plays to see and/or places to visit” based on “a user’s determined interests and correlations of other users’ interest.”

Those aren’t the only potential applications of the Microsoft patent, but at its core, isn’t that what Amazon.com has done, and patented, dating back at least a decade?

At any rate, maybe there’s more nuance here than I’m perceiving. The newly issued Microsoft patent essentially takes data mining concepts used by businesses and adapts them for personal use.

“Personal data mining mechanisms and methods are employed to identify relevant information that otherwise would likely remain undiscovered,” according to the patent abstract. “Users supply personal data that can be analyzed in conjunction with data associated with a plurality of other users to provide useful information that can improve business operations and/or quality of life. Personal data can be mined alone or in conjunction with third party data to identify correlations amongst the data and associated users. Applications or services can interact with such data and present it to users in a myriad of manners, for instance as notifications of opportunities.” (more…)

Microsoft refugee Don Dodge discovers Macs

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

By Todd Bishop
TechFlash

TechFlashStartup guru Don Dodge has gotten so much coverage since being let go from Microsoft, and subsequently hired by Google, that frankly I’ve pretty much tuned it all out. That said, his post yesterday on his discovery of Macs is worth a read — not because of any major new insights into the age-old Mac vs. Windows debate, but because of its implicit message about the technological blinders dutifully donned by many Microsofties.

This sentence, in particular, caught my attention: “After years of defending Microsoft against the Apple fanatics I decided to go to the other side of the road to see for myself,” Dodge writes.

Good for him, but the fact that he hadn’t seen the other side of the road as a Microsoft employee is a symptom of a larger problem at the Redmond company. Loyalty to and appreciation for your own products is nice, to a point, but after interacting with people at Microsoft for the better part of the past decade, I’ve never quite understood, logically, why it’s taboo for its employees to use competing products.

Of course, the company isn’t alone in this cultural tendency, but in my experience, Microsoft is exceptional in its fanaticism. If anyone doubts what I’m saying, flash back to September at Safeco Field for a moment.

Another example came recently on the Daily Show. “I am a very loyal Microsoft user,” said Bill Gates when Jon Stewart suggested that his departure from day-to-day life at the company would let him use an iPhone.

“We Bing, and we Bing, Bing, Bing, Bing, at least all the time in my world,” said Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer during his recent Consumer Electronics Show keynote.

Really? That’s too bad. Out here in my world, we Google and Yahoo and Bing and use anything else that will help us find what we’re looking for. I’ve been “Binging” more than usual lately, not out of blind loyalty, but because in some situations I prefer the results it delivers, and the experience. But I’m also constantly comparing those results to other search engines, to make sure I’m getting the best information — in the same way I experience Windows and OS X and Linux and as many other types of technology as I can get my hands on. (more…)

Affiliate publications: ACBJ.com, Boston Business Journal, Bizjournals.com, Portfolio.com, Wired.com

Web Site Developed by Neptune Web, Inc.

Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads.