Archive for the ‘Education & Training’ Category

Mass grabs three top places for scientists to work

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

By Julie Donnelly

Julie DonnellySome of the best places for scientists to work for no money are here in Massachusetts. The Scientist magazine has put out its yearly “Best Places to Work” list for post-docs, and three of the top ten are located in Massachusetts. For the uninitiated, post-docs are the low men and women on the scientific totem pole. They toil for long hours in the bowels of Harvard and MIT buildings with no one to talk to but transgenic mice. They get paid something like $40,000, even though they all have Ph.D.s already. They do it because it helps enhance their resumes or, in this economy, because it’s a good alternative to the frosty job search process.

Post-docs are the lifeblood of early stage research, and although most of that research ultimately fails, there would be far fewer drugs on the market today if the post-doc system did not exist. Treating them well would seem to be a societal good.

The most fulfilled post-docs in Massachusetts work at the Whitehead Institute at MIT, according to The Scientist. The survey ranked the institute the third best place to work, out of the top 40 listed in the survey. Workers there said they benefited from exemplary facilities, infrastructure and funding to support their research. However, they gave the Whitehead low marks for communication and being conducive to family and personal life.

The fourth favorite research institution in the national survey wasn’t at Harvard — it was at Swiss drug maker Novartis’ Institutes for Biomedical Research in Cambridge. There, workers extolled Novartis’ equitable workplace and the benefits. But there too, post-docs complained their personal lives had to suffer.

Coming in at number nine on the list was Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Here, the workers surveyed said their jobs allowed for family and personal life and offered great opportunities for career development. Woods-Hole post docs said the drawbacks were the facilities and infrastructure, as well as the benefits.

MIT president Hockfield touts MIT’s economic influence

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

Rodney BrownBy Rodney H. Brown

What do you do if as a university you are responsible for more annual revenue generation than most of the countries in the world? Make sure you can keep producing the innovators that are behind that innovation economy, MIT president Susan Hockfield told members of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce at a breakfast forum Wednesday morning.

The economic data Hockfield cited comes from a Sloan School of Management study that says that MIT alumni have been responsible for starting 25,800 existing companies that employ more than 30 million people and pull in more than $2 trillion combined in annual revenue. That only counts companies still running as individual entities and only alumni still alive, and it still adds up to the equivalent of the 12th largest economy on the planet.

With that kind of a legacy, it is no surprise that one of Hockfield’s missions is to continue putting innovators into the pipeline, and it is working with the city of Boston to expand an existing program to help mentor students in science and engineering to all public schools in the city. That program began at the John D. O’Bryant School of Mathematics and Science in Roxbury, formerly known as Boston Technical High School, and has led to three O’Bryant students currently in the MIT undergraduate program, Hockfield said.

Hockfield noted that such programs have wide support within the business sector as well, because the technology-based businesses that are the drivers of Massachusetts’ economic engine need that talent pipeline as much as MIT does.

“Frankly, the success of MIT is not about MIT alone, it is about the region,” Hockfield said.

While the difficult economy has been weighing on everyone’s mind, Hockfield challenged those in the room to embrace the points of value that it provides.

“This region is poised to take advantage of this opportunity that is disguised as a crisis,” Hockfield said.

Can MIT do more to prime the talent pump? How can business and industry help? Let us know what you think.

OLPC shows off XO 3.0 tablet concept

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

One Laptop Per Child has unveiled its latest concept of a future XO laptop, the XO 3.0.

The 3.0 is more of a tablet than a laptop, and it’s $75 projected price undercuts OLPC’s as-yet-unrealized $100 goal for the first XO by $25. The tablet would feature a screen courtesy of ex-OLPCer Mary Lou Jepsen’s display technology startup Pixel Qi.

The tablet looks pretty fancy, but it’s just a concept with a target date of 2012. Last month, the Cambridge-based nonprofit killed plans for its similar-except-foldable XO 2.0. Also, founder Nick Negroponte told Forbes, “”We don’t necessarily need to build it. We just need to threaten to build it.” So you might not want to hold your breath.

UNH study: Twitter, Facebook don’t affect grades

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

UNH social media study

Jackie NoblettTweet this: kids addicted to social networking still do well in school.

A study of more than 1,100 University of New Hampshire Students by its Whittemore School of Business showed there is no link between heavy use of Twitter, Facebook or any other social media Web site and their grades. Some 63 percent of heavy users of social media, defined by UNH as spending more than 61 minutes per day on such sites, received straight As or As and Bs for a semester, compared to 65 percent of light users, or ones that use social medial less than 31 minutes per day.

Poor students also tend to be poor students, even without spending time on YouTube or MySpace. Some 37 percent of heavy users got Bs and lower in their classes, compared with 35 percent of light users.

The findings shouldn’t surprise most techies — collegiate distractions are not unique to the Internet age, and one’s Facebook addiction is another’s PBR vice. Yet gadgetry does not necessarily make people any smarter either. Only 26 percent of students said they use social media for educational reasons. Tweeting exam answers to a classmate doesn’t count.

MIT students build robot prototype of Monty Burns’ sun-blocker

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

Some researchers at MIT CSAIL had a problem with sunlight coming through their humongous Stata Center windows. Instead of squinting their way through computer monitor glare and cursing out the sun like I would have, they built a robot to climb the building’s framework and block the sun’s rays.

Sure, it sounds cute now. But wait till when they reveal their endgame: Building a large-scale version to block out the sun so all of Kendall Square can only get electric light powered by Mr. Burns’ nuclear plant. After the jump, watch video of the gigantic, evil, cartoon version of the glare-blocking robot. (more…)

MIT team pays cash for balloon coordinates to win DARPA Network Challenge

Monday, December 7th, 2009

MIT’s entry has won the DARPA Network Challenge, which had teams using the Internet to find 10 red balloons placed around the country, from Portland Ore., to Katy, Texas, to Christiana, Del.

The MIT team cleverly outsourced the search to … everyone, more or less, in a convoluted pyramid scheme that paid cash to the finder of a balloon, the person that invited the finder to the competition, the person that invited that person and a charity.

Researchers on the team used the scheme to learn about how social networks spread information.

Ben Gulak’s Uno redesign makes cycle both weirder and more normal

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

BPG Inc. photo

MIT undergrad Ben Gulak’s Cambridge-based startup, BPG Inc., has redesigned its electric unicycle — the Uno.

Gulak told Popular Science the Uno now has the ability to transform from a Segway-like configuration with two side-by-side wheels to a more recognizable motorcycle mode. The changes were made to make the self-balancing bike a safer ride.

Just in time for the holidays, BPG is taking $1,500 down payments on the bike now.

MIT Mad Science Research Center hiring “grotesque lab assistants”

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

Fake newspaper The Onion reports MIT’s Mad Science Research Center’s previous estimates on the debut of its corpse-reanimation technology were about 10 years off.

More New England technology news from the Onion:

Google Zeitgeist, Boston edition: I seem to be missing something

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Google released their list of fastest rising search terms for 2009 — nationally, Michael Jackson took the top spot. Jacko was followed by some unsurprising terms — Facebook, Twitter, Lady Gaga, Windows 7 — and some things I don’t know what they are — “tuentro,” “sanalika,” “dantri.com.vn” and “torpedo gratis.” Even searching those words just now didn’t really help. I might just need more coffee.

Local results don’t make much more sense. At No. 1, we have “BU student link,” which I figured was about BU student/accused prostitute killer Philip Markoff, but is instead an actual Boston University student services web site.

No. 2: “eCommons.” This one also has nothing to do with killing anybody, and is also a college student service web site — Harvard Medical School’s this time. We might have too many college kids around here.

At No. 3: “Gloucester Daily Times,” which I’ll bet shocked even the Gloucester Daily Times. This is the year after the 2008 Time Magazine story about the “pregnancy pact” that either happened or didn’t, and its interminable fallout.

Restaurant Week” and “BHCC” at Nos. 3 and 4, respectively, seem reasonable enough, with the recession making expensive restaurants less, and community colleges more popular. “UMB.edu” follows at No. 6, which seems a little like calling someone to ask for their phone number.

MBTA Commuter Rail,” “7News Boston,” “WBZ TV” and “Coolidge Corner Theater” finish off the list. Nothing weird there, but where’s “David Ortiz“? The guy had a season-opening slump that almost killed half the local population, and then had a positive drug test leaked. I don’t even know who you people are any more.

Winners = losers in business plan competitions?

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Business plan competiton season is in full swing — the MIT 100K’s Elevator Pitch Competition, and the Executive Summary Contest is getting started. Researcher/entrepreneur/business plan competition judge Vivek Wadhwa weighs in at TechCrunch, suggesting that losing business plan competitions may be better for startups than winning. Wadhwa calls the competitions a relic of the dot-com era, and compares winners to children whose parents praise them too much.

A quick scan of past winners backs up Wadhwa’s argument — the winners haven’t gone on to become huge successes, while Akamai, Harmonix and Brontes all lost.

Meanwhile, investor/entrepreneur/business plan competition judge Sim Simeonov says he disagrees with Wadhwa but adds his own criticism, saying the competitions move the target from creating a successful business to winning the competiton, and force judges to decide a winner without any kind of VC-style due diligence.

So what does all that mean for Rouzbeh Shahsavari, who recently won five grand for his nano-engineered concrete startup? Who knows? Above, watch Shahsavari possibly doom his startup by winning, and the other contestants ensure wild success by losing the $100k Elevator Pitch Contest last month.

Affiliate publications: ACBJ.com, Boston Business Journal, Bizjournals.com, Portfolio.com, Wired.com

Web Site Developed by Neptune Web, Inc.

Use of, registration on, this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement. Please read our Privacy Policy (updated) A publishing partner with Portfolio