Archive for March, 2010

No Dirty Harry, PAX Enforcers have Sudden Impact on crowds

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

by Rodney H. Brown

Rodney BrownDespite the recent news about the alleged hacker that tried to steal the code of an unreleased game at the recent PAX East show at the Hynes Convention Center, the show itself should be a model of how to run an enormous event for any planners out there.

The credit for keeping 60,000 game-crazed nerds in line and happy goes in no small measure to the 400 or so volunteers that the PAX founders call “Enforcers.” Anywhere you went in the Hynes this past weekend you could see at least two or three red T-shirted men or women helping answer questions, clearing congestion spots or — most importantly — keeping the long lines for specific events orderly and at least content if not happy. And, good folks, those lines were very, very long.

The two founders of the Penny Arcade Expo and the Penny Arcade web comic that spawned the show, Jerry Holkins and Mike Krahulik, said in their Sunday morning press briefing that they understood that the lines for panels and events were long, but that was their choice. One way some shows keep lines down is to charge extra for attendance of each individual panel or event.

“People with money think that’s a good idea and other people maybe with less money don’t like it,” Holkins said. “In general we decided to say that you can invest time, which everyone has, instead of money to go to see the panels that you want.”

With the knowledge that lines are just a given fact of life at PAX, Holkins, Krahulik and, more directly, Robert Khoo, the director of PAX, enlisted the Enforcers who had very strict guidelines they had to enforce, which applied equally to media as to the general public. That was a jarring lesson to learn for someone who had never covered a PAX show before.

At first it rankled to have to talk past the Enforcers simply to stand at the edge of the main theater to hear and take pictures of the keynote address by actor and gamer Wil Wheaton. After all, press is always accorded special access to trade shows, right? Well, in an e-mail sent out to the press a few days before the show opened, it became clear that PAX was a different animal. For instance, it stated that having a media badge would get you access to any panel or event but did not give you the right to bypass the line – you had to stand and wait like everyone else. And if you didn’t get into that line early enough before the room filled up, tough.

After the second time a good bit of jawing was required to get into a panel for a few shots, it became clear that the Enforcers meant business. But it also started to become clear that what they were doing was keeping what could otherwise be a logistical nightmare humming along like clockwork. Nerdy, costumed clockwork, true, but clockwork nonetheless.

The upshot is that I got into every single panel or event I needed to, and I realize now that the Enforcers were simply very efficient gatekeepers. The gate could be opened but not by any casual attempt. And by the time the show ended, I welcomed the site of the Enforcers in their red T-shirts (and often kilts for some reason), whether they were standing guard over a closed door, or walking up and down a hallway with a sign held up like Lloyd Dobler with a boombox, saying “The X-Play panel is full!”

Any large show should be so lucky to have people willing to do such jobs for nothing but occasional access to the show and some schwag.

38 Studios: Should Curt Schilling stay or should he go?

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

By Michelle Lang

After the Providence Journal first reported that retired Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling may move his video gaming startup 38 Studios to Rhode Island, we at Mass High Tech were all a-flutter in pursuing confirmation of the news.

In case you missed it, Schilling will not be moving the startup to the Ocean State … at least not yet. And maybe not to Rhode Island. Maybe to some other state. But his goal is “to remain in Massachusetts.”

Okay, so what then are we reporting? Schilling’s wishy-washy loyalty to the Bay State? The indication that 38 Studios could bring a slew of new jobs — potentially up to 400 or so new ones — that would prompt the need for more space to grow?

Something tells me we may have fallen for the oldest PR trick in the book (maybe not the oldest, but a good one) — any news is better than none. Sure, 38 Studios is an important and promising startup to Massachusetts’ innovation economy and its budding gaming cluster, but really, what companies don’t talk theoretically about growing their number of employees? And what companies don’t weigh their options of moving for the sake of saving a few bucks?

Terrafugia, the Woburn maker of the ‘flying car’, did that just last month. And we chased that talk just as fervently, as did nearly every other local media outlet.

In that case, Terrafugia CEO Carl Dietrich told us that he had six to eight weeks to decide if the company would accept an offer of $4.4 million to move into a facility in Dayton, Ohio. His frustration by the lack of interest from local investors ultimately attracted attention from U.S. Sen. John Kerry, who paid a visit to the company; a couple of state senators who also made the trip to see the flying car and talk with Dietrich; and a group of investors who offered to provide larger headquarters.

No word yet if Terrafugia will fly west for good or if its recent attention garnered the investments it was seeking to stay in Greater Boston.

In the end, the news has thus far succeeded in bringing attention to both companies, which they, no doubt, hope will translate to money and a feasible reason to stay in Massachusetts.

As for us, maybe translating the inconclusive musings of Schilling isn’t so bad…if it means we played a role in keep businesses and jobs in New England.

Women to Watch: What makes them special

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Jim ConnollyBy James M. Connolly

Intelligence, dedicated, leader, innovative, hard-working — they’re all words associated with the 11 women recognized with the Mass High Tech Women to Watch awards this morning. But back at the office we were talking how commonly another word has to be applied to the 2010 honorees and their 60 predecessors.

It’s their humility. It’s so striking. We at Mass High Tech see it over and over again. We contact them in January to tell them they have been selected, and their total surprise is genuine. When we interview them for profiles, they talk about other women who would be more deserving, or how they can’t believe they are in the same ranks with certain women tech leaders that they admire.

2010 MHT Women to Watch

These are inventors, heads of huge development teams and CEOs. They’ve earned the right to brag.

Instead, they stand up at a podium and praise other women. They are grateful to their parents and the members of their teams. They talk about how it just makes sense for them to give back, to help and mentor young people.

Be sure to check out their profiles in this week’s Mass High Tech or on MassHighTech.com. There’s something special about them that goes beyond bits, bytes and biotech. The 250 people who came out to honor them this morning understand it. It’s their humility.

Women’s wisdom comes back around

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

By Michelle Lang

If you’ve ever heard the lyrics to Brad Paisley’s “Letter to Me”, you know that the country crooner made a song of taking his adult wisdom and imparting it on his 17-year-old self, reminding him not to bother arguing with his dad, to enjoy the adventure of his date with Bridget, and to thank his teacher for spending time with him.

The same concept is done daily by parents telling their kids, “Back when I was your age…”

Now, in honor of Women’s History Month, the Science Club for Girls is embracing the same concept; they’ve asked bright women leaders in science, engineering and technology careers to write “a letter to my young self.” What’s the point? To inspire young would-be scientists, highlight women in STEM, challenge the “geek” stereotype of those in science and enlighten people about the number of science careers available.

What interests us is that several of the Mass High Tech 2009 Women to Watch honorees have written a letter to their young selves.

Anna Mracek Dietrich, chief operating officer of Terrafugia Inc., wrote to herself, “You always regret the things you don’t do more than the things you do” (within boundaries of legality and logic).

Intel lead technologist Mondira Pant advised her 15-year-old self to “enjoy your present, welcome your doubts but don’t be afraid.”

Ronnie Maffa, Director of Social Software Product Development at IBM Corp., told her young self on the edge of possibly taking on a new project: “Be prepared that you may not be chosen. More importantly, be prepared that you will be chosen. Either way, you would have strengthened your position and preparedness for the future.”

The letters are another attempt to get science in front of girls and women. You might wonder just how many of these groups we need. After all, we’ve got the Science Club for Girls, Society of Women Engineers, the Association for Women in Science — and that’s just with a quick Google search. But it comes down to peer pressure. Just as friends, family and neighbors can sway one to a life of drugs, enough women leading interesting lives and careers in science may sway others to embrace science and technology.

So that’s our strategy too. Mass High Tech is peer pressuring girls and encouraging women leaders in science with our annual Women to Watch event on Friday, March 19, and our special report, coming out March 17, dedicated to this year’s crop of inspirational women in tech. By now, we’ve talked to our 11 new women honorees, interviewing them on their early influences, challenges and accomplishments, and they’re shaping up to be another group of go-getters. To hear what the women have to say, join us for breakfast on March 19.

Mass grabs three top places for scientists to work

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

By Julie Donnelly

Julie DonnellySome of the best places for scientists to work for no money are here in Massachusetts. The Scientist magazine has put out its yearly “Best Places to Work” list for post-docs, and three of the top ten are located in Massachusetts. For the uninitiated, post-docs are the low men and women on the scientific totem pole. They toil for long hours in the bowels of Harvard and MIT buildings with no one to talk to but transgenic mice. They get paid something like $40,000, even though they all have Ph.D.s already. They do it because it helps enhance their resumes or, in this economy, because it’s a good alternative to the frosty job search process.

Post-docs are the lifeblood of early stage research, and although most of that research ultimately fails, there would be far fewer drugs on the market today if the post-doc system did not exist. Treating them well would seem to be a societal good.

The most fulfilled post-docs in Massachusetts work at the Whitehead Institute at MIT, according to The Scientist. The survey ranked the institute the third best place to work, out of the top 40 listed in the survey. Workers there said they benefited from exemplary facilities, infrastructure and funding to support their research. However, they gave the Whitehead low marks for communication and being conducive to family and personal life.

The fourth favorite research institution in the national survey wasn’t at Harvard — it was at Swiss drug maker Novartis’ Institutes for Biomedical Research in Cambridge. There, workers extolled Novartis’ equitable workplace and the benefits. But there too, post-docs complained their personal lives had to suffer.

Coming in at number nine on the list was Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Here, the workers surveyed said their jobs allowed for family and personal life and offered great opportunities for career development. Woods-Hole post docs said the drawbacks were the facilities and infrastructure, as well as the benefits.

Maine bill looks to label cell phones as cancer dangers

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Today in the hallowed halls of the state government in Augusta, Maine, legislators are holding hearings on a first-in-the-nation bill that proposes putting warning labels about potential brain cancer on all cell phones sold in the state. Labels that even contain pictures.

The bill in question is LD 1706, somewhat redundantly called “An Act to Create the Children’s Wireless Protection Act.” The Maine state legislature’s Health and Human Services Committee is holding the hearings today, on a bill that has already created national news for the Pine Tree State.

HP120701 An Act To Create the Children’s Wireless Protection Act

Sponsoring the bill is Rep. Andrea Boland, D-Sanford. The bill calls for these exact words on every cell phone and all related packaging: “Warning, this device emits electromagnetic radiation, exposure to which may cause brain cancer. Users, especially children and pregnant women, should keep this device away from the head and body.”

Even more astounding is that the bill would require the label to have art, after a fashion. Boland’s bill wants to put on every cell phone a “color graphic of ‘Brain of 5-year-old’” from a 1996 study published by the IEEE of the effect of cell phone microwave emissions on the neck and head.

The onus of the bill would land squarely on the shoulders of the phone manufacturers, as the bill contains this proviso: “The requirements of this subsection may not result in a cost to the retailer or distributor of cellular telephones.” And the summary states that “This bill provides that a manufacturer may not sell at retail in this State…” any cell phone not carrying the warning.

The technology industry trade group TechAmerica today released a statement about the bill, saying that it “substitutes political judgment for the collective scientific judgment of experts around the world.” The National Cancer Institute, on the other hand, is hedging its bets. That organization has said that while “research has not consistently demonstrated a link between cellular telephone use and cancer, scientists still caution that further surveillance is needed before conclusions can be drawn” on its website.

What do you think? Are we at risk of brain cancer from our cell phones and do we need to be warned about it? Or is Maine making a call to Big Brother government?

New league brings back foosball — is Y2K to follow?

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

By Rodney Brown

Rodney BrownIs it a return of a pre-burst tech bubble stalwart or the final true sign of a new tech apocalypse? The possible harbinger of doom in this case is the newly launched Tech Hub Foosball League.

According to their own PR, the league is a “multi-team collaboration, bringing together Boston’s best techies, strategists and innovators for the opportunity to prove their foosball mastery…” The league will begin to hold weekly tournaments this month, which founders say will feature prizes such as consulting workshops with “the biggest names in innovation.”

Responsible for this blast from the tech past is Chase Garbarino of Boston startup Pinyadda and BostInnovation, and Bonnie Shaw of Somerville’s EchoDitto. Each team will host the foosball games in their offices and will provide refreshments for the real value in this proposition — the pre- and post-game networking.

According to the league’s Facebook page, Game 1 in the tournament is already planned for March 11 at Pinyadda in Boston. While most of the rest of the games in the six-game season have yet to be sited, the finale will be held at Microsoft’s NERD Center in Cambridge on April 22, according to the Facebook page.

The league can be found here Right now, there are nine members on that Facebook page, and only time will tell if the league’s founders have picked the right game to draw techies and innovators together. Do you hear that? Is that a Rock Band league tuning up?

Affiliate publications: ACBJ.com, Boston Business Journal, Bizjournals.com, Portfolio.com, Wired.com

Web Site Developed by Neptune Web, Inc.

Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads.